Does History Repeat Itself?

Q. Prompt:

“His­tory repeats itself. This is a tes­ti­mony to the stu­pid­ity of man.”

–Adapted from Edith Hamilton

“His­tory does not repeat. It rhymes.”

–Mark Twain

Assign­ment: Does his­tory repeat itself? […] Write an essay.

A. Does His­tory Repeat Itself?

No — in my view, His­tory does not repeat itself. I would con­cur with Mark Twain — ‘It [his­tory] rhymes’.

It has been rec­og­nized since time immemo­r­ial, that there are cer­tain pat­terns in nearly all our lives. These have also been exten­sively explored and researched in numer­ous fields. But we can see through numer­ous exam­ples, the rep­e­ti­tion of his­tory — that ‘deja vu’, but just not quite.

Since the start of the Earth, it has under­gone cli­matic changes of alter­nat­ing heat and cold. Every few thou­sand years, an ice age sets in. The inten­sity is known to vary — but still — that’s quite a long-term rhyme, isn’t it?

We can see how we our­selves are cur­rently suf­fer­ing from a swine flu pan­demic — ninety years later, once again. Per­haps even the dis­ease evolved along­side human tech­nol­ogy, and changed, but peri­od­i­cally it hap­pened once again. Another rhyme, eh?

We are also suf­fer­ing from a depres­sion in the world­wide stock mar­kets. Its com­ing was not entirely unex­pected, though per­haps its inten­sity was. Stock mar­ket cor­rec­tions hap­pen approx­i­mately every five years, with some vari­ance, and this depres­sion is sev­enty years after the last one. The Great Depres­sion of the 1930s was because of over­pro­duc­tion, and this time — the sub-prime cri­sis. Next time, the cause may be dif­fer­ent, but stock mar­ket falls are bound to rhyme, and come again and again. 

This rep­e­ti­tion — under­ly­ing pat­tern in the events of the world — have also been sci­en­tif­i­cally explained. Math­e­mati­cians believe in the Chaos The­ory, which pos­sesses tech­niques to spot pat­terns in the seem­ingly chaotic world, and even pre­dict the future! Of course, it’s nowhere close to telling us when we’ll die; but it’s ade­quate to con­firm how his­tory does not exactly repeat itself, but it def­i­nitely rhymes with itself.

x-:-:-x

How’dcha like it? Do tell me. You might’ve spot­ted it, but if you haven’t, there is a rea­son as to why I wrote this… :)

  • Kush

    SATs!!!

  • Pingback: Twitted by visheshk

  • http://blog.visheshk.net Mys­tic Ranger

    Exactly!! So, how’d you like it? :)

  • Kush

    I’d give it a 6 because of your exam­ples.
    The fact that you’ve put chaos the­ory into it speaks highly of your abil­i­ties both as a writ­ter and a thinker
    Very well writ­ten vishesh

  • http://blog.visheshk.net Mys­tic Ranger

    Thanks so much! Now, the job’s upon me to fit it into 25 mins… ;)

  • http://www.ankurb.info Ankur Baner­jee

    I fig­ured out the SAT bit too, but this essay is way way too short to get a good score. I’d give this a 4 or a 3. It’s good that you’ve given a few exam­ples but you need to elab­o­rate a bit. Length is tech­ni­cally not a cri­te­ria but it often tends to bias scorer judg­ment. I sug­gest you read up SparkNotes’s Power Tac­tics on SAT essay writ­ing (http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/newsat/powertactics/essay/index.html). Don’t go by Prince­ton Review guide­lines for the essay. Seriously.

  • http://blog.visheshk.net Mys­tic Ranger

    Short? Well, in writ­ing it cov­ered up two pages of my note­book, so I thought that’d be ade­quate. Espe­cially since a few sam­ple SAT essays I saw, were also about 300 words. And I’ll surely try to elab­o­rate on the exam­ples. Thanks for the sug­ges­tions and the link. I was pretty blindly trust­ing the Prince­ton Review book I had, so far… :)

  • Kush

    I guess what ankur wanted to say was elab­o­rate on one or two exam­ples rather than four.

  • http://www.ankurb.info Ankur Baner­jee

    Prince­ton Review’s tac­tics are OK if you’re a below aver­age guy aim­ing to get your­self up to an aver­age score, but it really doesn’t work out if you’re aim­ing for a high score. Joe Bloggs method is unnec­es­sary dumb­ing down. Sure, elim­i­na­tion helps but Joe Bloggs is use­less. If found Spar­kNotes test prep sec­tion and Kaplan to be bet­ter. Spar­kNotes test prep allows you to read whole book online for free, but it’s tedious as you need to go page by page. I would still sug­gest you to give it a shot because out of all the guides, only Spar­kNotes both­ers to actu­ally teach the con­cepts rather than preach­ing ‘try guess­ing your way out’.

  • Kush

    The 9th com­ment about it being a great post isn’t mine!

  • http://blog.visheshk.net Mys­tic Ranger

    Yeah! I’m sorry I didn’t notice it was a spam com­ment. So.. does that mean you didn’t think it was a great post? ;) Just kidding.

  • http://sahilb.blogspot.com Sahil

    SAT prompt! =P

    • http://blog.visheshk.net Mys­tic Ranger

      Of course! Though it had been estab­lished a bit ear­lier any­ways! :P ;)

    • http://sahilb.blogspot.com Sahil

      As in? :S
      p.s. I have a feel­ing the Intense Debate thingy is slow­ing down your site :P

  • vahan

    noobs

  • Pingback: The Art Of War